Skip to content

Conversation

@harshithad0703
Copy link
Contributor

  • Configure Surefire to run API tests (*IT.java) by default
  • Add 25+ new integration tests (GcpRegion, GlobalFields, Taxonomy)
  • Update send-report.sh for automated Slack reporting
  • Add maven-surefire-report-plugin for HTML reports

API tests: mvn clean test
Unit tests: mvn clean test -Dtest='Test*' jacoco:report

- Configure Surefire to run API tests (*IT.java) by default
- Add 25+ new integration tests (GcpRegion, GlobalFields, Taxonomy)
- Update send-report.sh for automated Slack reporting
- Add maven-surefire-report-plugin for HTML reports

API tests: mvn clean test
Unit tests: mvn clean test -Dtest='Test*' jacoco:report
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Nov 4, 2025

We regret to inform you that you are currently not able to merge your changes into the master branch due to restrictions applied by our SRE team. To proceed with merging your changes, we kindly request that you create a pull request from the staging branch. Our team will then review the changes and work with you to ensure a successful merge into the master branch.

@harshithad0703 harshithad0703 changed the base branch from master to development November 4, 2025 06:51
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Nov 4, 2025

We regret to inform you that you are currently not able to merge your changes into the master branch due to restrictions applied by our SRE team. To proceed with merging your changes, we kindly request that you create a pull request from the staging branch. Our team will then review the changes and work with you to ensure a successful merge into the master branch.

… additional edge cases and validation scenarios.
…, configurations, factory methods, headers, and various edge cases.
…TestStack class, covering various scenarios including disabled live preview, null parameters, and parameter assignment.
@harshithad0703 harshithad0703 changed the title feat: Separate unit/API tests and enhance integration test coverage Separate unit/API tests and enhance integration test coverage Nov 6, 2025
…s, JSON handling methods, edge cases, and token validation scenarios.
…uilding methods, method chaining, and various edge cases.
…TestStack and TestTaxonomy classes, streamlining test coverage.
… plugins and validating their request/response handling in the Contentstack environment.
…er handling, error setting, and URL parameter conversion, enhancing overall test coverage.
…y, and QueryResult classes, focusing on exception handling, validation scenarios, and edge cases to enhance overall test coverage.
…eaterThanOrEqualTo method, covering various scenarios including null keys, existing keys, chaining, and different value types to enhance test coverage.
…Hub Actions for unit testing with coverage checks
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Nov 7, 2025

📊 Unit Test Coverage Report

Overall Project NaN% NaN% 🍏

There is no coverage information present for the Files changed

…eneration and verification steps, ensuring coverage reports are created and validating their existence before badge generation.
…ring creation with character array for long values and update list creation to use Arrays.asList for better readability and compatibility.
… paths and adjust test execution parameters to ensure accurate coverage reporting and validation.
…ge checks with output variables, and add PR comment for coverage summary.
…mprove JaCoCo coverage checks with XML report validation, and ensure consistent execution of coverage summary and report upload steps.
…setup to version 9 with Zulu distribution, streamline coverage extraction from JaCoCo HTML report, and enhance PR comment formatting for coverage summary.
@contentstack contentstack deleted a comment from github-actions bot Nov 7, 2025
@contentstack contentstack deleted a comment from github-actions bot Nov 7, 2025
@contentstack contentstack deleted a comment from github-actions bot Nov 7, 2025
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Nov 7, 2025

Coverage Summary

  • 📘 Instruction Coverage: 93%
  • 🌿 Branch Coverage: 82%

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants